[rancid] Re: Adding version tags into CVS/config files

john heasley heas at shrubbery.net
Tue Sep 26 00:31:09 UTC 2006


Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 02:39:00PM -0700, Lance Vermilion:
> John,
> 
> Are you saying that @VERSION@ will return the version of rancid?

It should be replaced by autoconf with the release version, coming from
include/version.h.in.

> I am interested in knowing what the other core script versions are as well.
> Where is the @VERSION@ variable stored?
> Are the values in VERSION $Id: scriptname,v version?
> 
> -- 
> 
> -Lance <lance at gheek.net>
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 02:27:13PM -0700, john heasley wrote:
> > To me, the more interesting bit is just the release, not the CVS revision.
> > That is simple as replacing @VERSION at .  Also, hpuifilter -v will report
> > the version.
> > 
> > Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 05:00:28PM -0400, Burton Windle:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Lance Vermilion wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > I have seen the question "What version of (rancid/clogin/etc) am I 
> > > > running?" come up a few different times. I know that each script has its 
> > > > own version etc. It would be nice to have something like what is below 
> > > > add at the top of each config. This would make it extremely clear what 
> > > > was used to collect the configs and what versions are being used.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Speaking from experience as one of those people who has recently asked 
> > > that same question...
> > > 
> > > I checked the rancid script for a -v, -V, or --version argument first, 
> > > then went searching the text of the script for a (non-CVS) version. I 
> > > never thought of checking the CVS repo for the RANCID version; having an 
> > > argument to the program (or in this case, the script) and have it spit out 
> > > the version would be, IMHO, very handy (and more in-line with other Unixy 
> > > apps, so more likey to be stumbled upon by the typical admin).
> > > 
> > > Having to dig in the CVS repo is, I would think, unlikey to get found 
> > > without some handholding, be it FAQ or list.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Burton Windle                           bwindle at fint.org
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Rancid-discuss mailing list
> > > Rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
> > > http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rancid-discuss
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rancid-discuss mailing list
> > Rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
> > http://www.shrubbery.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rancid-discuss
> 



More information about the Rancid-discuss mailing list